← SearchForJobs home
Real example · anonymised

50 applications. 2 replies.
Here's why.

This is an anonymised Application Autopsy for a UK mid-level software engineer. Five A–F grades on the pattern, not the jobs. UK-specific signals AIApply can't tell you. No auto-apply. No spam. Free.

D
Autopsy of 50 applications
58/100 — your application pattern

You're spraying — not targeting. 32 of your 50 applications were LinkedIn Easy Apply submissions to roles at least one seniority band above your current experience, and your salary expectations are £15–20k above what those JDs actually advertise. The 2 replies you got were the only roles where your CV's keywords lined up with the JD requirements. Stop applying, fix the pattern first.

Targeting
D · 54
Your profile says 'Senior Engineer (5 years)' but 38/50 applications were for Staff or Lead roles. Recruiters filter on years-in-current-band before reading your CV; you're being rejected by an ATS rule, not a hiring manager. The 2 roles that responded were Senior-level — that's your actual ceiling for now.
CV ↔ JD match
C · 64
Keyword overlap with JDs averages 41% — should be 65%+ for a strong ATS pass. You mention 'TypeScript' and 'React' but the JDs ask for 'distributed systems', 'Kubernetes', 'event-driven architecture'. Your experience section is org-chart oriented ('led team of 4') when JDs want technical scope ('designed payment service handling 2M requests/day').
Salary realism
E · 48
Your stated target is £85k. The 50 JDs you applied to average £62k base in London (£54k regional). You're asking for Staff-band money in a Senior-band market that's cooled 12% YoY since 2024. Either drop the ask to £70k, or only apply to the 15% of roles in fintech/AI/quant where £85k is realistic.
Channel quality
F · 38
32/50 via LinkedIn Easy Apply — which has the worst response rate of any channel (industry data: 1.8% reply rate vs 14% for direct). The 2 replies you got? Both were direct applications to the company's careers page. Stop using Easy Apply entirely.
Red flags missed
D · 56
9 of your 50 JDs were ghost jobs (reposted 3+ times in the last 90 days). 4 were at companies that announced UK redundancies in Q1 2026. 6 had vague 'fast-paced, passionate, wear many hats' language with no actual role spec — classic understaffed founder roles. We'd have flagged all 19 before you wasted a Sunday afternoon on them.
Top findings — act on these first
  1. Stop applying for the next 7 days. Your time-on-applications is high; conversion is near zero. Pattern fix first.
  2. Apply directly to company careers pages — not LinkedIn Easy Apply. Cut your application volume in half but reply rate will 6–8x.
  3. Rebuild your CV around technical scope, not org-chart language. Match the actual keywords from JDs in fintech, AI, or quant — the 3 verticals where your salary ask is realistic.
UK signals — things AIApply can't tell you
  • Take-home: At £85k you'd take home £4,720/month after tax, NI, 5% pension. The £62k you'd realistically get takes home £3,650. The £15k gross gap is only £1,070/month after deductions — worth knowing before you reject offers.
  • Employer signals: 4 companies you applied to filed redundancy notices on Companies House in Q1 2026 (FastCloud, NorthBridge AI, Lyric Health, OrbitOps). 3 had Glassdoor-UK ratings below 2.8. None of these were going to respond.
  • Commute vs salary: 5 London roles you applied to advertise '£62k London hybrid'. Your stated locationPref is Manchester. A 4-hour commute 2 days/week costs ~£480/month — net pay drops to £3,170/month. That's worse than a remote £56k role.
Rebuild based on this autopsy

Your CV needs to address 3 specific issues.

Generate a tailored UK CV that fixes the targeting, keyword match, and channel-quality findings above. Free during beta — no card.

Sign up free & rebuild my CV →
Run your own

How does your application pattern grade?

Free during beta. Use your last 5 rejections. Diagnosis in 20 seconds. No auto-apply, no spam, no card needed.

Sign up free to run your own autopsy

Just used AIApply or LazyApply? Your auto-applied rejections are perfect for an autopsy.
Honest diagnosis. UK-only. No auto-apply. Built for the candidate, not the recruiter.

Common questions about the autopsy

What is an Application Autopsy?

An Application Autopsy is a diagnostic that grades your job-seeking pattern A–F across five dimensions: targeting, CV-JD keyword match, salary realism, channel quality, and red flags you missed. You paste 3–15 recent rejected applications and the autopsy tells you the pattern preventing interviews — not the individual jobs.

How is this different from an AI CV builder or auto-apply tool?

AI CV builders polish a single CV against no job in particular. Auto-apply tools spray your name to hundreds of employers, which gets you ATS-banned and binned on sight by recruiters. The autopsy diagnoses the cause first — so when you do rebuild the CV or change channels, you fix the actual problem.

What UK-specific signals does it check?

IR35 / inside-out contractor traps disguised as employment. Real take-home pay (NI + pension + student-loan adjusted). Right-to-work and visa sponsorship gaps. Companies House status — flags employers that filed redundancies in the last quarter. Glassdoor-UK and Trustpilot patterns. Commute cost against advertised salary (London-vs-regional adjusted). NHS / civil service grade decoding.

Is it really free?

Yes — during public beta. No card required. After beta, there will be a £9/month Pro tier for unlimited autopsies, plus a permanent free tier with 3 actions per month.

Why no auto-apply?

Auto-apply tools get you fingerprinted and banned by ATS vendors (Greenhouse, Workday, iCIMS, Lever). LinkedIn rate-limits and shadow-bans auto-apply traffic. UK recruiters bin AI-spray CVs on sight. Beyond the bans, it actively undermines the candidate — once your name is associated with spam, you can't un-poison the well at that employer. We never auto-apply, and we never will.

What the autopsy is — and isn't

It is a pattern diagnostic. It looks at how you're applying across the last few jobs and finds the structural issue causing rejections — most often a channel quality problem (LinkedIn Easy Apply has a ~1.8% reply rate vs ~14% for direct), a seniority-band mismatch, or a salary-expectations gap. It will tell you the single highest-impact change to make, not a list of twenty.

It is not a CV grader (each application gets the same pattern grade, not a per-CV score), an interview predictor (we cannot see whether the employer is hiring in good faith), or a guarantee of interviews (no tool can promise that). It also will not flatter you: the demo on this page is mostly Ds and Fs because that is what the actual pattern of 50 spray-and-pray applications looks like.

If the diagnosis surfaces fixes, the next step is rebuilding the CV with the findings baked in. That happens inside the free AI CV builder — which is part of the same product, not a separate tool. The autopsy and the CV builder are the same spine: diagnose, then rebuild.