← SearchForJobs home
Real example · anonymised

50 applications. 2 replies.
Here's why.

This is an anonymised Application Autopsy for a UK mid-level software engineer. Five A–F grades on the pattern, not the jobs. UK-specific signals AIApply can't tell you. No auto-apply. No spam. Free.

D
Autopsy of 50 applications
58/100 — your application pattern

You're spraying — not targeting. 32 of your 50 applications were LinkedIn Easy Apply submissions to roles at least one seniority band above your current experience, and your salary expectations are £15–20k above what those JDs actually advertise. The 2 replies you got were the only roles where your CV's keywords lined up with the JD requirements. Stop applying, fix the pattern first.

Targeting
D · 54
Your profile says 'Senior Engineer (5 years)' but 38/50 applications were for Staff or Lead roles. Recruiters filter on years-in-current-band before reading your CV; you're being rejected by an ATS rule, not a hiring manager. The 2 roles that responded were Senior-level — that's your actual ceiling for now.
CV ↔ JD match
C · 64
Keyword overlap with JDs averages 41% — should be 65%+ for a strong ATS pass. You mention 'TypeScript' and 'React' but the JDs ask for 'distributed systems', 'Kubernetes', 'event-driven architecture'. Your experience section is org-chart oriented ('led team of 4') when JDs want technical scope ('designed payment service handling 2M requests/day').
Salary realism
E · 48
Your stated target is £85k. The 50 JDs you applied to average £62k base in London (£54k regional). You're asking for Staff-band money in a Senior-band market that's cooled 12% YoY since 2024. Either drop the ask to £70k, or only apply to the 15% of roles in fintech/AI/quant where £85k is realistic.
Channel quality
F · 38
32/50 via LinkedIn Easy Apply — which has the worst response rate of any channel (industry data: 1.8% reply rate vs 14% for direct). The 2 replies you got? Both were direct applications to the company's careers page. Stop using Easy Apply entirely.
Red flags missed
D · 56
9 of your 50 JDs were ghost jobs (reposted 3+ times in the last 90 days). 4 were at companies that announced UK redundancies in Q1 2026. 6 had vague 'fast-paced, passionate, wear many hats' language with no actual role spec — classic understaffed founder roles. We'd have flagged all 19 before you wasted a Sunday afternoon on them.
Top findings — act on these first
  1. Stop applying for the next 7 days. Your time-on-applications is high; conversion is near zero. Pattern fix first.
  2. Apply directly to company careers pages — not LinkedIn Easy Apply. Cut your application volume in half but reply rate will 6–8x.
  3. Rebuild your CV around technical scope, not org-chart language. Match the actual keywords from JDs in fintech, AI, or quant — the 3 verticals where your salary ask is realistic.
UK signals — things AIApply can't tell you
  • Take-home: At £85k you'd take home £4,720/month after tax, NI, 5% pension. The £62k you'd realistically get takes home £3,650. The £15k gross gap is only £1,070/month after deductions — worth knowing before you reject offers.
  • Employer signals: 4 companies you applied to filed redundancy notices on Companies House in Q1 2026 (FastCloud, NorthBridge AI, Lyric Health, OrbitOps). 3 had Glassdoor-UK ratings below 2.8. None of these were going to respond.
  • Commute vs salary: 5 London roles you applied to advertise '£62k London hybrid'. Your stated locationPref is Manchester. A 4-hour commute 2 days/week costs ~£480/month — net pay drops to £3,170/month. That's worse than a remote £56k role.
Rebuild based on this autopsy

Your CV needs to address 3 specific issues.

Generate a tailored UK CV that fixes the targeting, keyword match, and channel-quality findings above. Free during beta — no card.

Sign up free & rebuild my CV →
Run your own

How does your application pattern grade?

Free during beta. Use your last 5 rejections. Diagnosis in 20 seconds. No auto-apply, no spam, no card needed.

Sign up free to run your own autopsy →

Just used AIApply or LazyApply? Your auto-applied rejections are perfect for an autopsy.
Honest diagnosis. UK-only. No auto-apply. Built for the candidate, not the recruiter.

Common questions about the autopsy

What is a job application autopsy?

A job application autopsy is an application diagnostic that looks at your rejections as a set, not one at a time. You give it 3 to 15 recent applications and it grades the pattern A–F across five dimensions: who you targeted, how well your CV matched the advert, whether the salary expectation was realistic, which channel you applied through, and the red flags you walked straight past. Here’s the thing — fifty rejections almost never have fifty causes. They usually have one, and it just keeps repeating.

How is this different from an AI CV builder or auto-apply tool?

AI CV builders polish a single CV against no job in particular. Auto-apply tools spray your name to hundreds of employers, which gets you ATS-banned and binned on sight by recruiters. The autopsy diagnoses the cause first — so when you do rebuild the CV or change channels, you fix the actual problem.

What UK-specific signals does it check?

IR35 / inside-out contractor traps disguised as employment. Real take-home pay (NI + pension + student-loan adjusted). Right-to-work and visa sponsorship gaps. Companies House status — flags employers that filed redundancies in the last quarter. Glassdoor-UK and Trustpilot patterns. Commute cost against advertised salary (London-vs-regional adjusted). NHS / civil service grade decoding.

Is it really free?

Yes — during public beta. No card required. After beta, there will be a £9/month Pro tier for unlimited autopsies, plus a permanent free tier with 3 actions per month.

Why no auto-apply?

Auto-apply tools get you fingerprinted and banned by ATS vendors (Greenhouse, Workday, iCIMS, Lever). LinkedIn rate-limits and shadow-bans auto-apply traffic. UK recruiters bin AI-spray CVs on sight. Beyond the bans, it actively undermines the candidate — once your name is associated with spam, you can't un-poison the well at that employer. We never auto-apply, and we never will.

What the autopsy is — and isn't

It is a pattern diagnostic. It looks at how you're applying across the last few jobs and finds the structural issue causing rejections — most often a channel quality problem (LinkedIn Easy Apply has a ~1.8% reply rate vs ~14% for direct), a seniority-band mismatch, or a salary-expectations gap. It will tell you the single highest-impact change to make, not a list of twenty.

It is not a CV grader (each application gets the same pattern grade, not a per-CV score), an interview predictor (we cannot see whether the employer is hiring in good faith), or a guarantee of interviews (no tool can promise that). It also will not flatter you: the demo on this page is mostly Ds and Fs because that is what the actual pattern of 50 spray-and-pray applications looks like.

If the diagnosis surfaces fixes, the next step is rebuilding the CV with the findings baked in. That happens inside the free AI CV builder — which is part of the same product, not a separate tool. The autopsy and the CV builder are the same spine: diagnose, then rebuild.